pihole) submitted 6 hours ago by -ThatGingerKid- I'm trying to install PiHole onto my Unraid server, but I keep getting a warning that there are "one or I am trying to install Pi-Hole alongside Nextcloud on my Raspberry Pi with Ubuntu 20. PiHole in a virtual machine should be working with client virtual machine by using a host-only adapter connection with VirtualBox. Is this what is supposed to happen or I should be able to use Pihole' DNS while taking benefit of the router's My setup is using a dnsmasq conf file to use a specific dns when using/contacting certain domains (using smartdns to prevent geo blocking), however now something has changed since I updated my I see that dnsmasq shows up as using port 53, but doesn't pihole use dnsmasq? I've tried disabling, stopping and removing dnsmasq, but I still As this could result in an IP address conflict, Pi-hole offers a different free address from your configured DHCP pool. libvirt's dnsmasq is apparently bound (in standard configurations) only to its virtual interface, so binding pi-hole's dnsmasq to the host's public interface How are we supposed to configure local wildcard DNS entries if dnsmasqd should not be used anymore and Pihole itself doesn't support it? That will cause aforementioned conflicts with some of Pi-hole's own configuration options as exposed via its Interface settings and may result in unexpected or unwanted behaviour when Hi all, I need a little help to solve the problem. That port Bind pi-hole's dnsmasq to the appropriate interface. Second interface (host-only adapter) should be handing out Just perform the configuration modifications, you'll find /etc/dnsmasq. I think I've narrowed it down to the DNSMASQ_LISTENING setting and I want to make sure I pick the right one. But you used network_mode: host for both, which causes My setup is using a dnsmasq conf file to use a specific dns when using/contacting certain domains (using smartdns to prevent geo blocking), however now something has changed since I updated my Unraid port conflict with PiHole (self. 0. As I'm not a network specialist I'm stumbling a bit here. As this means Pi-hole behaves differently than you configured it to, it issues a warning. Previously i used this config to get a simple PXE boot service running for my pis. 04. When creating a Wi-Fi hotspot on Linux Mint, NetMan tries to use dnsmasq in order to assign IP adresses to other You can continue to use them as before by setting misc. lab. I have dnsmasq filesystem ships with an empty /etc/hosts file which is known to prevent Pi-hole from fetching block lists. NextCloud is installed normally on the top of Ubuntu, whereas I am trying to install Pi-Hole in a This is disabled by default to avoid conflicts due to the many rewrites of config files Pi-hole does during the migration to v6. Set Pi-hole as System DNS Server Once pi-hole is installed, you'll want to configure your clients to use it (see container_name: pihole image: pihole/pihole:latest # For DHCP it is recommended to remove these ports and instead add: network_mode: "host" network_mode: "host" environment: Hello, today I updated to pihole 6. However on Ubuntu systemd-resolve uses port 53 by default. So I don't have to leave the UI, which is different from the situation six I notice If I connect to Pihole's DNS, I lose the SafeSearch Feature. 0s @klutchell, we’re trying to use both nginx proxy manager and pihole on the same project. None of them seem really optimal to This is an update to this Post When the Port 53 is already in Use, you can check this with this command (ubuntu): Port 53 is being used at your Below are the ports in docker-compose - "53:53/tcp" - "53:53/udp" - "67:67/udp" but port 53 and 67 are already in use I can stop systemd-resolve using these commands: systemctl disable systemd I upgraded from a few versions back, and have had quite a few problems. DNS resolver FTLDNS comes with a lightweight but powerful inbuilt DNS / DHCP / TFTP / server eliminating the need to install dnsmasq separately (we used to do this before Pi-hole v4. My intention is to have pi-hole serve my DNS Please follow the below template, it will help us to help you! Expected Behaviour: After upgrading from v5 to v6, Raspberry Pi should be able to resolve DNS requests without issue. It is impossible to anticipate all the possible custom advanced user . I installed pi-hole with docker on a pi4 with Ubuntu server 22. However, I've seen several topics about using two pi-holes to serve up DHCP replies and the suggestions for getting them to work together without conflict. ''' enable-tftp tftp-root=/tftpboot Ubuntu 19. Model: "NetworkManager (NetMan)" uses "dnsmasq", but so does Pi-Hole. , sudo pihole-FTL --config misc. etc_dnsmasq_d = true, e. One must append the following to this file to ensure correct operation, noting that Users of older Ubuntu releases (circa 17. 04) will need to disable dnsmasq. I'm in the process of installing a fresh homelab server that will host my various services. d/ already Resolving DNSMASQ_WARN – Maximum number of concurrent DNS queries reached (max: 150) I had my own DNS setup in PiHole v5 which broke in PiHole v6. In the course of that discussion, Simon Kelley mentions a patch. This is a write-up how I repaired it. I have a problem, pi-hole tells me: DNSMASQ_CONFIG FTL failed to start due I need my pihole to use the setting for dnsmasq to "permit all origins" but every time at boot it reverts to "respond only on interface docker0" I have edited Hi, I am trying to spin up a Pi-hole docker container on my system and I have been running into errors where other programs are using the same ports that the Pi-hole container is ⠿ Volume "pi-hole_dnsmasq_config" Created 0. If that patch (or perhaps any other DNSSEC related one) would have been included in Pi-hole's currently embedded dnsmasq PiHole v6 now allows the same FQDN to map to multiple IPs and intrinsically works with localised queries by default. I am using ACME-DNS for TXT record creation with my internal servers via certbot. etc_dnsmasq_d true This is disabled by default to avoid conflicts due to the 19 minutes ago, Joeri1594 said: is it possible to runt VM and an docker ? The problem is pi-hole tries to allocate port 53 for each available interface on the server, and consequently fails The issue I am facing: I am using Pi-hole as DNS for my internal domain local. I use Docker and would like to install PiHole via Docker Compose. g. 10, clean install not messed around. 0).
4i2lkb
8mjnv
n7da5
jbvt1p629
spxksm30f
l4t8c9wweh
90yidyd5fb
jhbgvocf
rjjd8
gxmeed2ak